-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spatial readme #4381
Spatial readme #4381
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe README in the spatial directory has been updated. The "Site Selection Using Locate Tool" section now explicitly describes a machine learning approach for analyzing and identifying optimal sensor placement locations. Additionally, the API endpoint method has been changed from a GET request to a POST request. The required parameters and example request remain unchanged. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant API as API Server
participant ML as ML Module
U->>API: POST /api/v2/spatial/site_location with payload
API->>ML: Process sensor placement using ML
ML-->>API: Return optimal locations
API-->>U: Deliver response
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #4381 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 11.21% 11.21%
========================================
Files 156 156
Lines 17985 17985
Branches 388 388
========================================
Hits 2017 2017
Misses 15966 15966
Partials 2 2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/spatial/README.md (2)
94-94
: Enhanced Locate Tool Description with ML CapabilitiesThe updated description clearly states that the Locate Tool leverages Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal sensor placement within a defined polygon. This added detail improves clarity regarding its purpose.
Note: Ensure that similar language consistency is maintained throughout the documentation—specifically, verify that the term "analyze" is used uniformly (avoid mixing with "analyse") as highlighted by the static analysis hint.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Do not mix variants of the same word (‘analyze’ and ‘analyse’) within a single text.
Context: ...ement by using Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal locations within a...(EN_WORD_COHERENCY)
123-123
: Typographical Correction NeededThere is a minor typo in the note on line 123: "withinh" should be corrected to "within".
A suggested diff for clarity:
- Must have locations should be coordinates withinh the polygon. + Must have locations should be coordinates within the polygon.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/spatial/README.md
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/spatial/README.md
[uncategorized] ~94-~94: Do not mix variants of the same word (‘analyze’ and ‘analyse’) within a single text.
Context: ...ement by using Machine Learning (ML) to analyze and identify optimal locations within a...
(EN_WORD_COHERENCY)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build-push-deploy-spatial
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/spatial/README.md (1)
97-98
: Updated API Endpoint MethodThe HTTP method for the site_location endpoint has been updated from GET to POST, reflecting the new design intended for sensor placement requests. Please confirm that backend logic and corresponding tests have also been updated to support POST requests.
Spatial changes in this PR available for preview here |
Description
I updated the API usage details and recommended a POST request for improved efficiency.
Related Issues
Changes Made
Testing
Affected Services
Endpoints Ready for Testing
API Documentation Updated?
Additional Notes
[Add any additional notes or comments here]
Summary by CodeRabbit